School Improvement Research Series
(SIRS)Research You Can Use
Topical Synthesis #4 Educating Urban Minority Youth:
Research on Effective PracticesKathleen Cotton
INTRODUCTION
Few issues in education are of greater concern to policymakers, educators, and the general public than the plight of ethnic and racial minority students in the nation's urban schools. To be sure, many of these young people receive high-quality educations, achieve at admirable levels, and complete high school equipped with the knowledge and skills needed for further education or entry-level employment. An alarming number of these students, however, achieve at significantly lower levels than their white counterparts and leave school--either through dropping out early or at graduation--lacking the skills and knowledge required by employers, colleges, and trade schools.
Research indicates that, collectively, black children, by sixth grade, trail their white peers by more than two years in reading, mathematics, and writing skills, as measured by standardized achievement tests (Lomotey 1989, p. 82), and this disparity continues or widens in later school years. The average performance of black and Hispanic students on the Scholastic Aptitude Test is more than 50 points lower than the average performance of white students (Bates 1990, p. 11). And whereas approximately 12 percent of white students drop out of school, nearly 14 percent of black students and 33 percent of Hispanic students do so (National Center for Education Statistics 1989). Dropout figures are considerably higher in urban areas. Ascher (1985) notes that "the Hispanic dropout rate in urban areas appears to range from a high of 80 percent in New York to a low of 23 percent in San Antonio" (p. 3), and Lomotey (1989) found that the dropout rate for urban black students is nearly 50 percent (p. 82).
In the past, young people without basic literacy and mathematics skills could expect to enter the workforce as unskilled, low-paid workers. However, even this minimal kind of employment opportunity is becoming less and less prevalent. As Slavin, Karweit, and Madden point out in their 1989 resource on educational programming for at-risk students:
The U.S. economy no longer has large numbers of jobs for workers lacking basic skills....Allowing large numbers of disadvantaged students to leave school with minimal skills ensures them a life of poverty and dependence--the consequences of which are disastrous to the social cohesiveness and well-being of our nation. (p. 4)
In addition, the percentage of minority young people in the nation's public schools is increasing. By the year 2000, one of every three students will be from a minority racial or ethnic group, with the vast majority of these being black and Hispanic young people (Pine and Hilliard 1990). In urban areas, more than half the students currently attending school are members of minority groups, and this percentage will continue to grow.
Another way to look at urban minority school enrollment comes from Corcoran, Walker, and White's 1988 report indicating that 71 percent of all black students and over 50 percent of all Hispanic students attend schools in inner-city settings (p. 7).
Urban minority children also tend to be among America's poorest citizens. Of the many statistics that could be cited, a few from Reed and Sautter's 1990 report on children and poverty should make clear the economic disadvantages experienced by these children and their families:
- More than 12.6 million U.S. young people--nearly 20 percent of all children under the age of 18--are poor.
- Two thirds of poor Americans are white, but the rate of poverty is considerably higher for minorities.
- Four out of nine black children are poor.
- Three out of eight Hispanic children are poor.
- More than 56 percent of families headed by single black women are poor.
- The poverty rate for families headed by single Hispanic women is 59 percent.
And, as Young and Melnick (1988) point out, poverty and its attendant problems are much more severe in the inner cities than in other geographical settings and greatly exacerbate the educational disadvantages experienced by the students who live there.
Many analysts have called attention to the fact that the school improvement and reform efforts that have been undertaken in many U.S. school districts have largely bypassed urban schools (Lomotey 1989, Carnegie Foundation 1986, Cuban 1989, Ruffin 1989). The plight of urban education and the failure of school improvement efforts to bring about significant change have led many concerned Americans to cite inner-city school problems as education's most serious issue. The Carnegie Foundation's recent report on urban education states:
We are deeply troubled that a reform movement launched to upgrade the education of all students is irrelevant to many children--largely Black and Hispanic--in our urban schools.
(Quoted in Lomotey 1989, p. xii)Cuban (1989) speaks for many educators and other concerned citizens when he writes, "The future of urban schools is the primary issue facing the nation's educational system" (p. 29).
A full-scale analysis of urban problems--in education or other areas--is outside the scope of this report. For present purposes, it is sufficient to note that schooling practices have largely failed to meet the learning needs of urban minority young people and that reversing this pattern is critically important--for these students themselves, of course, but also for the social and economic health of the nation.
Fortunately, a great deal is known about the kinds of schooling practices which are effective for educating these "at-risk" students. Educational research and evaluation efforts have identified many practices which lead to positive academic and affective outcomes for these young people, and these are cited following a context-setting discussion of the effective schooling research.
THE EFFECTIVE SCHOOLING RESEARCH
The effective schooling research base is a large body of educational research literature which documents relationships between an array of district, school and classroom practices, on the one hand, and students' academic and behavioral performance, on the other. Researchers have looked at factors which distinguish schools and classrooms with high-achieving, appropriately behaving students from those in which achievement and behavioral outcomes are less desirable.
This series of "topical synthesis" reports looks at particular topical areas--in this case, effective practices for educating urban minority group students-- in light of what the general effective schooling research has to say about practices which lead to positive outcomes for students in general.
In 1984, staff of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory's School Improvement Program developed a synthesis of the research on effective schooling. This popular and widely used resource was updated in mid- 1990 and, in its current version, synthesizes findings from over 800 research documents. Classroom-, school-, and district-level practices shown to foster positive achievement and other student outcomes are cited in the research synthesis.
A review of the research on promising practices for educating inner-city minority youth reveals that it is highly congruent with the general effective schooling research, as outlined in the updated synthesis report. There are two reasons for this: One is that the educational needs of urban minority children are not fundamentally different from the needs of other students in other settings. A second reason is that much of the original effective schooling research was conducted with inner-city, largely minority populations in the first place. If the research on urban minority students reveals any difference from the general effective schooling research, it is that the use of these validated practices is even more critical for the education of this target group of students than for students in general.
THE RESEARCH ON URBAN MINORITY STUDENTS
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESEARCH
The findings reported in this summary are based on a review of 96 resources, 61 of which are research documents demonstrating relationships between educational practices and student outcomes. The other 35 are more general references, addressing such topics as desegregation planning, anti-racism education, program content, minority teachers, and the over- or underrepresentation of minority students in different school programs and other categories.
Of the 61 research documents, 27 are reports of studies or evaluations, 33 are reviews, and one is a metaanalysis of findings from several studies. All are concerned with students at risk of school failure, and most of these are inner-city black or Hispanic students (and sometimes other minority populations as well) from low-income families.
Schooling practices investigated in the research include tracking and long-term ability grouping, tutoring, multicultural programming, parent involvement, different administrative styles, retention, cooperative learning, bilingual education, anti-racism education, early childhood programming, presence or absence of minority school personnel, and an array of climate and instructional variables.
Outcomes areas measured include achievement in general and in particular subject areas, student attitudes, student self-concept, dropout rates, student motivation, race relations, disciplinary infractions, employability, IQ scores, grades, English language proficiency, incidence of special and remedial education referrals, absenteeism, detentions, and homeschool relations.
RESEARCH FINDINGS: EFFECTIVE PRACTICES
Major figures in the effective schooling research effort--researchers such as Edmonds, Brookover, Weber, and Venezky and Winfield --compared high-performing urban schools with schools that were demographically similar but had inferior student outcomes. These investigations led them and other researchers to identify and list school and classroom factors which seemed to make the difference between effective and ineffective schools. Effective schools, they found, were characterized by features such as strong administrative leadership focused on basic skills acquisition for all students, high expectations of students, teachers who took responsibility for their students' learning and adapted instruction to make sure that learning was taking place, safe and orderly school environments, the provision of incentives and rewards for student performance, and regular monitoring of student progress.
These findings were very important. The work of some earlier researchers (e.g., Coleman, et al. 1966; Jencks, et al. 1972) had concluded that background factors, such as parents' educational and socioeconomic levels, were much stronger determinants of student performance than school-controllable factors such as climate and instruction. They concluded, in other words, that schools couldn't do much to make up for the deficits encumbering students from poor, uneducated family backgrounds.
The findings of the effective schooling researchers about the powerful effects of school-controllable variables overturned the gloomy conclusions of these early researchers. As stated by Soder and Andrews (1985):
By identifying schools that were effective regardless of family income or ethnic status, the Effective Schools research...attributed differences in children's performance to the schools themselves. (p. 8)
Looking at more recent research focused on inner-city schooling practices leads, not surprisingly, to a list of effective schooling components which is very similar to that identified by the effective schooling researchers, plus others which have particular relevance to members of minority racial and ethnic groups. Effective practices for educating urban minority students include:
Strong administrative leadership. Administrators in effective schools give top priority to basic skills acquisition and are actively involved in helping shape the instructional program. They support the instructional improvement efforts of teachers and provide the resources needed to make improvements possible. (Andrews, Soder, and Jacoby 1986; Armor, et al. 1976; Brookover 1981; Brookover and Lezotte 1979; Druian and Butler 1987; Edmonds 1977, 1979a,b; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; High and Achilles 1984; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Levine and Lezotte 1990; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983; Valverde 1988; Venezky and Winfield 1979; Weber 1971)
Teacher responsibility and sense of self-efficacy. Effective teachers in urban minority schools see themselves as responsible for student learning. They do not perceive learning problems as products of students' personal backgrounds, but rather as indications that adaptations need to be made in instructional approach so that learning can take place. These teachers believe in their ability to reach and teach virtually all of their students successfully. (Armor, et al. 1976; Brookover 1981; Brookover and Lezotte 1979; Cuban 1989; Edmonds 1977, 1979a,b; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Levine and Lezotte 1990; Alderman 1990; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990)
High expectations. Closely related to their belief in their own efficacy is these teachers' conviction that virtually all students can master basic learning objectives. Just as important, these teachers continually communicate these high expectations to students through their encouragement and support, and by holding them responsible for in-class participation, completing assignments, etc. Since many students tend to interpret their scores or grades as purely a matter of luck or native ability, these teachers emphasize to students the close relationship between personal effort and outcomes. (Armor, et al. 1976; Brookover 1981; Brookover and Lezotte 1979; Carta and Greenwood 1988; Cotton 1989; Druian and Butler 1987; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Johnson and Johnson 1988; Lomotey 1989; Murphy 1988; Pollard 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983; Weber 1971; Alderman 1990)
Safe, orderly, well-disciplined environments. Effective inner-city schools are characterized by school and classroom environments that are orderly and routinized, but not rigid. The school and classroom management literature underscores the need for rules and routines, but flexibility, too, is important. As Natriello, McDill, and Pallas (1990) point out, hardand -fast rules only work in settings where there aren't too many exceptional circumstances. The diversity and pressures in inner-city schools, in contrast, require flexible responses, especially regarding nonserious infractions. (Armor, et al. 1976; Druian and Butler 1987; Freiberg, Prokosch, and Treister 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Levine and Lezotte 1990; Weber 1971; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990)
Teaching adapted to different student needs. As noted above, effective teachers of urban minority students are flexible in their teaching approaches, modifying and adapting instructional materials and methods to meet the needs of different students. They are aware of the personal and cultural learning style differences of their students and respond to these with appropriate teaching approaches. (Cuban 1989; Edmonds 1977, 1979a,b; Freiberg, Prokosch, and Treister 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Levine and Lezotte 1990; Lomotey 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Natriello, McDill, and Pallas 1990; Oakes 1986b; School Improvement Program 1990; Venezky and Winfield 1979; Waxman 1989; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990)
Provision of incentives, reinforcement, and rewards. Verbal, symbolic, and tangible reinforcements help to sustain student interest and motivation, as do other learning incentives, such as games and group-oriented competitions. (Brookover 1981; Carta and Greenwood 1988; DeVries, Edwards, and Slavin 1978; Gooden, Lane, and Levine 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Johnson and Johnson 1988; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Rogers, Miller, and Hennigan 1981; School Improvement Program 1990; Sharan 1980; Slavin 1979)
Regular and frequent monitoring of student learning progress and provision of feedback. Successful teachers of urban minority students, like successful teachers of students in general, monitor students' progress closely, so as to be able to adapt instruction as appropriate to meet learning needs. These teachers also are careful to keep students informed about their progress and about steps that will be taken to remediate any learning problems noted. (Carta and Greenwood 1988; Druian and Butler 1987; Edmonds 1977, 1979a,b; Emihovich and Miller 1988; Garcia 1988; Gooden, Lane, and Levine 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Levine and Lezotte 1990; McPartland and Slavin 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983; Weber 1971)
Staff development programs focused on school improvement. Effective urban schools with large minority populations differ from less effective schools in that they have strong programs of staff development focused on school improvement. In addition, teachers in these schools have the power to influence the content and presentation of staff development activities. (Armor, et al. 1976; Gooden, Lane, and Levine 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; School Improvement Program 1990; Valverde 1988)
Use of school resources in support of priority goals. Decisions about the allocation of time, personnel, money, and materials are made on the basis of which activities are most likely to further the school's priority goals. In effective urban schools, this usually means generous resource allocations to activities which can foster the development of reading, mathematics, and language arts skills in all students. (Druian and Butler 1987; Edmonds 1977, 1979a,b; Gursky 1990; Jackson, Logsdon, and Taylor 1983; Levine and Stark 1982)
Parent involvement. Research demonstrates that parent involvement in instruction, in support of classroom and extracurricular activities, and in school governance is related to positive student learning outcomes and attitudes. Research also shows that such involvement is especially beneficial for many minority children, who may otherwise feel torn between the differing norms and values represented by the home and the school. (Cotton and Wikelund 1989; Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Gursky 1990; Levine and Stark 1982; Lomotey 1989; Murphy 1988; Pollard 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983; Walberg, Bole, and Waxman 1980)
Coordination among staff of different programs serving the same students. Many minority children in urban schools participate in remedial, special education, or other categorial programs. Researchers have noted that, in high-achieving schools, the efforts of different program personnel are carefully coordinated so that the programs provide a coherent, mutually supportive learning experience for participating children. (Griswold, Cotton, and Hansen 1986; Levine and Stark 1982; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Venezky and Winfield 1979)
The effective schooling attributes cited above emerge both from the general effective schooling research base and from recent research involving minority group students in inner-city settings. The attributes listed below are the products of research which has focused specifically on the special needs of minority group members.
Use of cooperative learning structures. While students in general are often shown to benefit from cooperative learning structures, urban minority students almost invariably do. Some researchers note that cooperation is more in keeping with the cultural values of many black and Hispanic students than is individual competition. In addition to the achievement benefits experienced by many students, cooperative learning has also been shown to enhance students' self-esteem, sense of self-efficacy as learners, cross-racial and -ethnic friendships, incidence of helping behavior, and empathy for others. (Brookover 1981; Conwell, Piel, and Cobb 1988; Cuban 1989; DeVries, Edwards, and Slavin 1978; Freiberg, Prokosch, and Treister 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Oakes 1986b; Rogers, Miller, and Hennigan 1981; School Improvement Program 1990; Sharan 1980; Slavin 1979; Slavin, Karweit, and Madden 1989; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990)
Computer-assisted instruction which supplements and complements teacher-directed instruction. While not a substitute for traditional, teacher-directed instruction, computer-assisted instruction which reinforces traditional instruction has been found to be appealing to inner-city children and to enhance their learning. (Emihovich and Miller 1988; McPartland and Slavin 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Slavin, Karweit, and Madden 1989)
Instruction in test-taking skills and activities to reduce text-taking anxiety. The relatively test poor performance of urban minority students is sometimes the result of failure to understand testing formats and/or anxiety about taking tests. Research supports the provision of direct instruction in test-taking skills and exercises which can reduce students' anxiety about test performance. (Brookover 1981; Conwell, Piel, and Cobb 1988; Cuban 1989; DeVries, Edwards, and Slavin 1978; Freiberg, Prokosch, and Treister 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Oakes 1986b; Rogers, Miller, and Hennigan 1981; School Improvement Program 1990; Sharan 1980; Slavin 1979; Slavin, Karweit, and Madden 1989; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990)
Peer and cross-age tutoring. Research has established that peer tutoring and cross-age tutoring arrangements are inexpensive and highly effective ways to build the basic reading and mathematics skills of young disadvantaged children so that the need for later remediation of skills deficits is reduced. (Carta and Greenwood 1988; McPartland and Slavin 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Slavin, Karweit, and Madden 1989)
Early childhood education programming. Research has amply demonstrated that inner-city children benefit enormously from Head Start and other forms of preschool programming, in terms of their later school achievement, attitudes, graduation rates, and many other outcomes. (Cotton and Conklin 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Clayton 1989)
Dividing large schools into smaller learning units and fostering ongoing relationships between students and school personnel. At the secondary level in particular, the school performance of inner-city students is often hampered by feelings of alienation. This alienation is the result of large, impersonal schools and of structures in which students have few, if any, ongoing relationships with school staff members. Recent research has established that innercity middle and high school students benefit when their schools are divided into smaller units, such as schoolwithin -a-school or other alternative programs, where students and staff get to know one another and work together over longer periods of time than in traditional structures. In successful programs of this kind, teachers are frequently selected on the basis of willingness and demonstrated ability to work with atrisk students. (Cuban 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; School Improvement Program 1990; Gooden, Lane, and Levine 1989; Murphy 1988)
Coordination of community resources. Inner-city students often have problems, such as health or nutrition needs, personal or family drug or alcohol problems, family abuse or neglect, etc., that need to be addressed in order for teaching and learning to proceed successfully. Some inner-city programs have taken on the responsibility of coordinating an array of social services and other community resources to meet students' needs and have produced promising outcomes. (Cuban 1989; Gursky 1990; McPartland and Slavin 1989)
Multicultural programming. Do minority group students benefit from multicultural programming? While there has not been a great deal of research on the effects of multi-cultural education programs in schools, the investigations that have been conducted indicate that both student attitudes and achievement are enhanced by such programming. Advocates note that, to be meaningful, multicultural programs need to go beyond brief, one-shot activities highlighting the exotic foods and colorful clothing of an ethnic group. Instead, they point out that multicultural activities need to be fully integrated into the core curriculum, and that, when they are, they can be powerful means to promoting cross-cultural understanding and respect. Valverde (1988) states:
Developing a multicultural climate is important because of the attitudinal impact it has on students. Principals need to realize that attending to the cultural aspect of human beings is not trivial but central to holding minority students in school and to promoting learning. (p. 324)
(Levine and Lezotte 1990; Lomotey 1989; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983; Valverde 1988; Pine and Hilliard 1990)
Increasing the percentage of minority teachers. There is currently a great deal of concern that, although the percentage of minority group students is increasing, the percentage of minority teachers is decreasing. Over the next decade the percentage of minority teachers is expected to drop from 12 to 5 percent (Pine and Hilliard 1990), while, as noted earlier, the minority student population will increase to 33 percent. Some efforts to attract minority group members to the teaching profession are already underway, and more should be undertaken, since the limited research in this area indicates that higher percentages of black and Hispanic teachers in schools are beneficial to black and Hispanic students.
The relationship between minority teacher population and minority student performance is complex and will not be analyzed in detail here. While no one claims that minority students have to be taught by minority teachers in order to learn well, it seems that there are definite benefits to having plenty of minority teachers in largely minority schools.
It is well known, for example, that black and Hispanic students are overrepresented in remedial programs, special education programs, low-ability groups and tracks, and vocational programs, as well as being overrepresented in the pool of students who repeat grades and those who are given disciplinary referrals, suspensions, and expulsions. And conversely, these students are underrepresented in academic tracks and in programs for gifted and talented students. (Bates 1990; Lomotey 1989; Murphy and Hallinger 1989; Oakes 1985, 1986a)
It is significant, therefore, that as the percentage of black and Hispanic teachers increases, the over- and underrepresentations of black and Hispanic students have been found to decrease. That is, with more minority teachers, the representation of minority students in the various programs and disciplinary categories begins to be closer to their percentage in the overall school population. It is speculated that this is because minority teachers can relate better to minority students and have more patience with their academic and behavioral needs. (Lomotey 1989; Corcoran, Walker, and White 1988; Farrell 1990; Pine and Hilliard 1990; Serwatka, Deering, and Stoddard 1989)
Activities to reduce racial and ethnic prejudice. If the practices cited above are implemented in urban schools, both minority and nonminority students can be expected to benefit, since research demonstrates that their effectiveness is global. The same is true of programs and activities undertaken to reduce racial and ethnic prejudice. It has already been noted, for example, that cooperative learning activities can promote racial and ethnic harmony, and multicultural activities foster mutual understanding and respect.
Other approaches which have been shown (in Gabelko 1988, Lomotey 1989, Pate 1988, etc.) to foster positive racial and ethnic relations include:
- Film and videotape dramatizations of the harm caused by prejudice and the benefits of diversity. Such presentations have been found to engage viewers' feelings and enable them to see issues from different points of view.
- Cognitive approaches, such as teaching students the fallacies of reasoning. These methods help students to see the illogic and shallowness of prejudicial thinking.
- Counterstereotyping activities, such as focusing on Jewish athletes, Hispanic scientists, black playwrights, etc. These activities help students to appreciate the diversity within racial and ethnic groups and reinforce the fact that "they" are not all alike.
- Activities which enhance self-esteem. These activities have many benefits, including the researchsupported finding that people with higher self-esteem have lower levels of racial and ethnic prejudice.
Pate (1989) warns that not all anti-prejudice educational approaches are equally effective, and that some can even be counterproductive. Direct antiprejudice lessons and some forms of human relations training, for example, must be handled with care, since people are often quite resistant to being told what is true and right to believe.
RESEARCH FINDINGS: HARMFUL PRACTICES
Clearly, we know a great deal about educational practices that benefit black and Hispanic youngsters in inner-city schools. Researchers have also made important discoveries about practices which are, at best, ineffective, and, at worst, very harmful to these students. These are academic tracking, retention in grade without accompanying support, excessive use of pullout programs, and indiscriminate assignment to special education programs.
Tracking. Three significant facts: (1) black, Hispanic, and poor students are overrepresented in lowability groups and nonacademic tracks; (2) research indicates that tracking does not produce greater learning gains than those obtained from heterogeneous grouping structures; (3) research shows that assignment to long-term low-ability groups and tracks is often harmful to students. Taken together, these facts describe a grave situation, one which has led some writers to pronounce long-term ability grouping--and particularly secondary-level academic tracking--as an essentially elitist practice. These writers are quick to acknowledge that proponents of tracking are not usually practicing conscious or deliberate discrimination, but that the effects are nevertheless discriminatory.
Many volumes have been written about the harmful effects of academic tracking on those assigned to low tracks. Ironically, low-track placements, which are supposed to "help" slower learners by offering "easier" and "more appropriate" materials, instruction, and pacing than those used with higher-track students, frequently make learning an unproductive and unpleasant experience. Research shows that, compared with students in higher tracks, those in lower-ability groups and tracks:
- Receive less clear explanations of learning activities and materials
- Experience less interactive teaching
- Are given content that is less academically oriented
- Experience more student and teacher interruptions in their classes and more dead time
- Have more "in-class homework," which reduces learning time
- Have fewer learning activities
- Have more and longer periods of seatwork
- Are often taught by less experienced, less capable teachers
- Experience less teacher enthusiasm and encouragement
- Experience lower levels of student-student cooperation and support
- Once tracked, have access to fewer academic courses in high school
- Have poorer attitudes about themselves as learners and lower educational aspirations.
(Brookover 1981; Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields 1990; McPartland and Slavin 1990; Murphy and Hallinger 1989; Oakes 1985, 1986a,b; Oakes, et al. 1990; Pine and Hilliard 1990; Schneider 1989; Slavin 1990)
Slavin (1990) writes:
...decisions about whether or not to ability group must be made on bases other than likely effects on achievement. Given the antidemocratic, antiegalitarian nature of ability grouping, the burden of proof should be on those who would group rather than those who favor heterogeneous grouping, and in the absence of evidence that grouping is beneficial, it is hard to justify continuation of the practice. (p. 494)
Retention in grade without adequate support. Black and Hispanic students are retained more often than other students, again with the hope that repeating a grade will help them to catch up and achieve at higher levels in the future. And, indeed, retention has sometimes been shown to be beneficial when "instructional arrangements...ensure that appropriate help is provided for retained students" (Levine and Lezotte 1990, p. 37).
Unfortunately, however, retention is often not accompanied by assistance targeted to the specific learning needs of retained students. This kind of retention-without-support ironically ends up creating the kinds of negative outcomes that retention is intended to prevent. Generally, when retained and nonretained students with the same levels of academic performance are compared, retained students:
- Have lower levels of achievement at subsequent grade levels
- Have poorer attitudes toward school and toward themselves as learners
- Are more likely to drop out of school (with the likelihood of dropping out nearing 100 percent for students who repeat two grades).
Alternatives to retention which have been found in effective schools include promotion with high-quality remedial assistance and transition classrooms that allow for flexible grade reassignments. (Frymier 1989; Levine and Lezotte 1990; Lomotey 1989; McPartland and Slavin 1989; Shepard and Smith 1990; Sizemore, Brossard, and Harrigan 1983)
In addition, Shepard and Smith (1990) point out that the annual cost to districts of retaining the 2.4 million students who are held back each year is nearly $10 billion (p. 87).
Excessive use of pullouts. Slavin, Karweit, and Madden (1989), School Improvement Program (1990) and other sources reveal that remedial programs (in which minority students are, again, overrepresented) are frequently operated on a pullout basis, and that assignment to these pullout programs (1) often stigmatizes participants and (2) causes fragmentation and discontinuity in these students' school experiences. Pullout instruction, researchers advise, should be short term and carefully coordinated with basic instruction.
Excessive assignment to special education classes. Minority students are overrepresented in special education classes, and since these placements are not reviewed for appropriateness as often as would be desirable, these students often remain in these classes long after they cease to be suitable for the students' needs. Inappropriate long-term assignments to special education classes are both damaging to the students involved and extremely expensive. McPartland and Slavin (1989) point out that:
...special education placement is often a dramatic onetime response to low achievement that has major continuing consequences on how educational resources are allocated. (p. 6)
Language Minority Students
Many Hispanic students are non-English speaking (NES) or limited-English-proficient (LEP), as are many Southeast Asian and other immigrant student populations. No review of effective schooling practices for urban minority youth would be adequate without at least a brief discussion of these students' special needs and ways to meet those needs.
There is, of course, a great deal of controversy surrounding the subject of bilingual education. Research is not altogether conclusive about the effects of bilingual education and, perhaps even more significantly, there is deep social and political divisiveness about its suitability. No attempt will be made here to resolve this complex issue. Instead, findings from several recent research studies and reviews will be itemized in hopes that these will make a meaningful contribution to the complex topics of bilingual education and second-language learning. Research suggests instruction of NES and LEP students should include:
- A strong academic core, like that provided for other students
- Identification and dissemination of promising practices for language minority students
- Assessment of English proficiency when the student enters the school system and periodic assessment thereafter
- For NES students, intensive English as a second language instruction, and core classes in the native language when possible (or at least native-language materials in conjunction with a native-language tutor, when these can be arranged)
- For LEP students, a combination of native language instruction and instruction in English
- The use of volunteer tutors to foster English language literacy.
(Ascher 1985; ASCD Panel 1987; Garcia 1988; National Hispanic Commission 1984; So 1987)
CONCLUSION
This paper provides a review of some key documents from the large and complex body of literature on educating urban minority students (particularly black and Hispanic), and offers a look at this literature in relation to findings identified in the effective schooling research base.
As will be obvious to those familiar with the effective schooling research, there is a high degree of congruence between its findings and those cited in the research on urban minority youth. The difference, insofar as there is one, is that middle class children, with the educational advantages conferred by their home backgrounds, can probably be expected to do quite well in school, even if some of the attributes of effective schooling are absent from their school experiences. For urban minority children, the presence of these attributes is more critical, since they provide the kinds of support that may not be present elsewhere in these students' lives.
Then, in addition to the importance the general effective schooling research findings have for urban minority students, other, more specific practices, are also beneficial to enhance the quality of these young people's school experiences.
To summarize, research indicates that the following elements enhance the achievement, attitudes, and behavior of minority group students:
- Strong leadership on the part of school administrators, which includes mobilizing resources to support the acquisition of basic skills by all students
- Teachers who believe they are responsible for students' learning and capable of teaching them effectively
- High expectations for student learning and behavior on the part of administrators and teachers, and active communication of these expectations to students
- Safe, orderly, well-disciplined--but not rigid-- school and classroom environments
- Teachers who are adept at modifying instructional materials and strategies in response to students' differing learning styles and needs
- The provision of incentives, reinforcement, and rewards to enhance student learning motivation and acknowledge achievements
- Regular, frequent monitoring of student progress and provision of feedback
- Programs of staff development which are focused on school improvement and influenced by teachers themselves
- Use of time, personnel, money, materials, and other resources in support of the school's priority goals
- Active involvement and use of parents for instructional support, classroom help, and input into governance decisions
- Coordination among staff of different programs serving the same children
- Use of cooperative learning structures
- Computer-assisted instructional activities which supplement and complement traditional, teacher-directed instruction
- Peer and cross-age tutoring
- Provision of early childhood education programs
- The use of small learning units within large schools, e.g., school-within-a-school, other alternative learning programs
- Promotion policies which allow accelerated remedial instruction and/or transition classrooms as alternatives to retention
- Provision of support targeted to the learning needs of those students who are retained in grade
- Coordination between school and community resources as needed to support children in need of services outside the school
- Multicultural programming, which is integrated into the overall school curriculum
- Recruitment and hiring of minority teachers
- Learning activities to reduce racial and ethnic prejudice
- Personnel, material, and activities to meet the needs of language minority students.
Research supports the elimination of tracking/long-term ability grouping and a reduction of retentions in grade. Research findings have also led investigators to call for much more judicious use of pullout programs and assignments to special education.
Other writers have quoted the stirring statement offered by the late Ronald Edmonds at the conclusion of his 1979 article "Effective Schools for the Urban Poor." Because they are an apt conclusion to the present discussion, these words also appear here:
We can, whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us...We already know more than we need to do that...Whether or not we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven't so far. (p. 23)
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Andrews, R. L.; Soder, R.; and Jacoby, D. Principal Roles, Other In-School Variables, and Academic Achievement by Ethnicity and SES. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 1986.
Reports the results of a study of the relationship between elementary school principals with different operating styles and the achievement gains of black and white students of different socioeconomic levels. Many findings were reported, including that poor and black children exhibited much greater achievement in school administered by strong instructional leaders.Armor, D.; Conry-Oseguera, P.; Cox, M.; King, N.; McDonnell, L.; Pascal, A.; Pauly, E.; and Zellman, G. Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Program in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1976. (ED 130 243)
Examines the factors associated with reading achievement gains in predominantly minority schools. Schools in which gains were noted were characterized by high expectations, parent involvement, ongoing staff development, and other factors.Ascher, C. Raising Hispanic Achievement. ERIC/CUE Digest Number 26. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, April 1985. (ED 256 842)
Discusses the nature of educational disadvantages faced by Hispanic students in the U.S. and the negative effects of these disadvantages. Offers research-based recommendations to improve schooling outcomes for Hispanic secondary students.ASCD Panel on Bilingual Education. Building an Indivisible Nation: Bilingual Education in Context. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, April 1987. (ED 282 973)
Discusses the nature and needs of limited-English proficient (LEP) students, research findings regarding effective methods for educating these students, related staff development needs, and other issues. Researchbased conclusions and recommendations are offered.Brookover, W. B. Effective Secondary Schools. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools, 1981.
Reviews research on effective schooling at the secondary level and identifies climate and instructional variables that enhance student achievement.Brookover, W. B., and Lezotte, L. W. Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement. East Langing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development, 1979. (ED 181 005)
Investigates the reasons for achievement increases in six low-SES urban elementary schools and for achievement decreases in two such schools. Identifies effective schooling practices in the improving schools.Carta, J. J., and Greenwood, C. R. "Reducing Academic Risks in Inner-City Classrooms." Youth Policy 10/7 (1988): 6-8.
Presents research findings regarding effective instructional practices for raising the achievement of inner-city poor and/or minority students. Also describes a peer tutoring program which incorporates many of these validated components and which has demonstrated success with at-risk elementary students.Conwell, C. R.; Piel, J. A.; and Cobb, K. R. Students' Perceptions When Working in Cooperative Problem Solving Groups. Paper presented at the North Carolina Science Teachers Association Convention, Asheville, NC, November 1988. (ED 313 455)
Investigates the effect of cooperative learning on black and white students' attitudes toward learning, toward themselves as learners, toward one another, and toward the cooperative learning structure.Cotton, K. Expectations and Student Outcomes. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1989.
Reviews research on the effects of teacher and schoolwide expectations on the achievement and attitudes of students. Found that (1) lowered expectations are sometimes held for and communicated to minority students, and (2) communicating high expectations promotes achievement and positive attitudes of all students.Cotton, K., and Conklin, N. F. Research on Early Childhood Education. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1989.
Reviews 28 research documents on the effects of early childhood education programs on the later achievement and affective outcomes of participants. The majority of the research was conducted with minority children and those from low-income families.Cotton, K., and Wikelund, K. R. Parent Involvement in Education. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1989.
Reviews 41 research reports on the effects of parent involvement on student achievement and attitudes. Parent involvement is beneficial to all students-- perhaps most of all to disadvantaged and minority children.Crain, R. L., and Mahard, R. D. Desegregation Plans That Raise Black Achievement: A Review of the Research. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1982. (ED 227 198)
Presents the results of a meta-analysis of 93 research reports on school desegregation and black student achievement. Findings include that desegregation raises the achievement test scores of black students, especially when it is begun early and when desegregated schools are predominantly (but not overwhelmingly) white.Cuban, L. "At-Risk Students: What Teachers and Principals Can Do?" Educational Leadership 46/5 (1989): 29-32.
Argues that school improvement and reform have largely bypassed urban schools and presents research findings concerning educational practices which promote success for students in these schools.DeVries, D. L.; Edwards, K. J.; and Slavin, R. E. "Biracial Learning Teams and Race Relations in the Classroom: Four Field Experiments Using Teams-GamesTournament." Journal of Educational Psychology 70/3
(1978): 356-362.Investigates the effects of the cooperative learning structure, Teams-Games-Tournament, on cross-racial friendships among black and white students in 7th grade classes. Particpants reported more cross-racial friendships than controls.Druian, G., and Butler, J. A. Effective Schooling Practices and At-Risk Youth: What the Research Shows. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1987.
Reviews research on at-risk youth in relation to the general effective schooling research. Concludes that the school and classroom characteristics associated with effective schooling are even more critical to the learning of at-risk students than other students.Edmonds, R. R. "Effective Schools for the Urban Poor." Educational Leadership 37 (1979): 15-27.
Reviews research on the effects of different schooling practices on the learning of poor, inner-city children to identify "the most tangible and indispendable characteristics of effective schools."Edmonds, R. R. Search for Effective Schools: The Identification and Analysis of City Schools that are Instructionally Effective for Poor Children. Boston, MA: Harvard University, 1977. (ED 142 610)
Offers a description of and findings from the "Search for Effective Schools" project, which sought to identify schools which were effective despite a poor, largely minority student population. Many schools and the elements which made them effective were identified.Edmonds, R. R. "Some Schools Work and More Can." Social Policy 9/5 (1979): 28-32.
Reviews findings from his own and others' research on the characteristics of schools which are effective in teaching disadvantaged children in urban settings. Strong administrative leadership, teachers who take responsibility for student learning, and a focus on basic skills acquisition are major attibutes of effective schoolsEmihovich, C., and Miller, G. E. "Effects of Logo and CAI on Black First Graders' Achievement, Reflectivity, and Self-Esteem." The Elementary School Journal 88/5 (1988): 472-487.
Examines the effects of Logo and CAI on the learning and affective outcomes of black first graders. Logo students outperformed CAI learners and controls, presumably because Logo activities are more in keeping with the cultural learning styles of black youngsters.Freiberg, H. J.; Prokosch, N.; and Treister, E. S. "Turning Around At-Risk Schools Through Consistency Management." Journal of Negro Education 58/3 (1989): 372-382.
Discusses and presents the results of the Consistency Management program, which applied the organizational and instructional correlates of the effective schooling research to improving learning and discipline in innercity schools.Frymier, J. A Study of Students at Risk: Collaborating to Do Research. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1989.
Presents findings from an analysis of data on over 22,000 students in 276 schools in 87 communities, with a special focus on the one-fourth to one-third of these students considered at risk for school failure. Data gathered from principals and teachers in these schools were also examined.Garcia, E. E. "Attributes of Effective Schools for Language Minority Students." Education and Urban Society 20/4 (1988): 387-398.
Reviews research on effective schoolwide and classroom practices for educating language minority students, particularly Mexican-Americans.Gooden, F. E.; Lane, M.; and Levine, D. U. "A SchoolWithin -A-School Approach for At-Risk Urban Students." Journal of Negro Education 58/3 (1989): 367-371.
Reports evaluation results of a School-Within-ASchool program for at-risk students in middle and high schools in Kansas City. Significant improvements were noted in areas such as basic skills test performance, reading comprehension, attendance, and dropout reduction.Griswold, P. A.; Cotton, K. J.; and Hansen, J. B. Effective Compensatory Education Sourcebook. Volume I: A Review of Effective Educational Practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 1986.
Reviews many major studies from the effective schooling research base to identify factors associated with achievement gains among disadvantaged students. Both classroom-level and schoolwide achievement correlates are cited.Gursky, D. "A Plan That Works." Teacher 1/9 (1990): 46-54.
Describes features of James Comer's Yale Child Study Center program, which has been extremely successful in raising the achievement of poor, minority, urban children. The YCSC model features use of a school governance, team, mental health team, and parent involvement program.High, R. M, and Achilles, C. M. Observations of Principals' Influence-Gaining Behaviors in Schools of Varying Levels of Instructional Effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Regional Council for Educational Administration, Atlanda, GA, November 1984. (ED 250 825)
Examines teachers' perceptions of the "influence gaining" behaviors of their principals in relation to achievment levels in six elementary and middle schools with 95 percent or greater minority enrollment. Principals of high-achieving schools exhibited validated leadership attributes to a greater degree.Jackson, S. A.; Logsdon, D. M.; and Taylor, N. E. "Instructional Leadership Behaviors: Differentiating Effective from Ineffective Low-Income Urban Schools." Urban Education 18/1 (1983): 59-70.
Examines instructional climate variables in four effective and four ineffective District of Columbia elementary schools to identify those related to achievement gains.Johnson, S. O., and Johnson, V. Motivating Minority Students: Strategies That Work. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, 1988.
Identifies experience- and research-based strategies and enrichment activities for working with minority students in school settings. Includes a summary of research on effective practices for educating these students.Johnson, S. T., and Wallace, M. B. "Characteristics of SAT Quantitative Items Showing Improvement After Coaching Among Black Students From Low-Income Families: An Exploratory Study." Journal of Educational Measurement 26/2 (1989): 133-145.
Investigates the effects of a coaching program intended to improve the SAT mathematics performance of black, urban students whose math skills were weak or average. The program was found to be effective in enhancing test performance.Levine, D. U., and Lezotte, L. W. Unusually Effective Schools: A Review and Analysis of Research and Practice. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development, 1990.
Synthesizes effective schooling research from the early 1970s forward, with a particular focus on the restructuring efforts of unusually effective schools and identification of practices which enable schools to become more effective.Levine, D. U., and Ornstein, A. C. "Research on Classroom and School Effectiveness and Its Implications for Improving Big City Schools." The Urban Review 21/2 (1989): 81-94.
Reviews the effective schooling and effective teaching research in terms of its implications for bringing about improvements in urban schools. Discusses urban school district projects based on findings from these research bases.Levine, D. U., and Stark, J. "Instructional and Organizational Arrangements That Improve Achievement in Inner-City Schools." Educational Leadership 40/3 (1982): 41-46.
Reports findings from a study of three large urban school districts to determine which instructional and organizational factors are related to improvements in elementary reading achievement.Lomotey, K. "Cultural Diversity in the School: Implications for Principals." NASSP Bulletin 73/521 (1989): 81-88.
Summarizes research on the disproportionately low achievement of African Americans and other minorities and on the kinds of schooling practices shown to improve academic and social outcomes for these students.McPartland, J. M., and Slavin, R. E. Increasing Achievement of At-Risk Students at Each Grade Level. Policy Perspectives Series. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, July 1990.
Summarizes research on effective practices for educating students at risk of school failure, provides brief descriptions of activities underway to address identified needs, and offers policy recommendations congruent with research findings.Murphy, J. A. "Improving the Achievement of Minority Students." Educational Leadership 46 (1988): 41-42.
Reports the results of an effort undertaken to improve the achievement of students in a low-SES, mostly black elementary school district in Maryland. Children's grades and their math and language arts performance on standardized tests improved dramatically.Murphy, J., and Hallinger, P. "Equity as Access to Learning: Curricular and Instructional Treatment Differences." Journal of Curriculum Studies 21/2 (1989): 129-149.
Reports on research which identifies many harmful effects of tracking on student achievement. Lower track students were found to experience instruction, curriculum, and learning environments inferior to those provided to higher-track students.National Commission on Secondary Education for Hispanics. Make Something Happen. Hispanics and Urban High School Reform. Volume I. Report of the National Commission on Secondary Education for Hispanics. New York: Hispanic Policy Development Project, Inc., 1984. (ED 253 598)
Provides an account of the status of Hispanics in inner-city public high schools and makes recommendations for improving that status.Natriello, G.; McDill, E. L.; and Pallas, A. M. Schooling Disadvangaged Children: Racing Against Catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press, 1990.
Discusses the disadvantaged population--who they are and what disadvantages they experience--and discusses the types and outcomes of programs developed to serve their needs. Offers recommendations for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to take to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged students.Oakes, J. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
Presents findings on the effects of ability grouping- -and particularly tracking--on student achievement, attitudes, and behavior. Concludes that tracking is harmful, and discusses the dilemmas posed by its persistent use in schools.Oakes, J. "Keeping Track, Part 1: The Policy and Practice of Curriculum Inequality." Phi Delta Kappan 68/1 (1986): 12-17.
Extends the discussion presented in Oakes' 1985 book, Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. Discusses the widespread use of tracking and its negative effects on poor and minority students, as well as demonstrating that tracking interferes with both educational excellence and equity.Oakes, J. "Keeping Track, Part 2: Curriculum Inequality and School Reform." Phi Delta Kappan 68/2 (1986): 148-154.
Continues the discussion of tracking in American schools, including a focus on why tracking is so entrenched and approaches educators might take to change attitudes toward tracking and begin to "detrack" schools.Oakes, J.; Ormseth, T.; Bels, R.; and Camp, P. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Math and Science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1990.
Presents the results of a large-scale study of the science and mathematics learning opportunities and experiences of poor, black, Hispanic, inner city, and/or low ability group students. Concludes that these students receive inferior instruction at the elementary level and drastically inferior instruction in high school.Pate, G. S. "Research on Reducing Prejudice." Social Education 52/4 (1988): 287-291.
Reviews a variety of approaches intended to promote racial and ethnic harmony and discusses the effectiveness and drawbacks of these. Provides a list of resources for countering prejudice.Pollard, D. S. "Against the Odds: A Profile of Academic Achievers from the Urban Underclass." Journal of Negro Education 58/3 (1989): 297-308.
Surveys the attitudes and experiences of high- and low-achieving poor, urban black and Hispanic secondary students to determine the factors associated with different achievement levels. Identified several factors which schools can influence to increase these students chances of school success.Rogers, M.; Miller, N.; and Hennigan, K. "Cooperative Games as an Intervention to Promote Cross-racial Acceptance." American Educational Research Journal 18/4 (1981): 513-516.
Examines the effects of engaging groups of black and white elementary school girls in playing games requiring cooperation. Observers noted more prosocial and fewer antagonistic cross-racial behaviors on the part of subjects following cooperative game participation.Schneider, J. M. "Tracking: A National Perspective." Equity and Choice 6/1 (1989): 11-17.
Discusses the use of tracking structures in American schools, outlines tracking's negative impact on poor and minority students, and reviews research on alternatives to traditional tracking practices.School Improvement Program. Effective Schooling Practices: A Research Synthesis. 1990 Update. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1990.
Synthesizes results from over 800 research articles on effective schooling and organizes them according to whether they are classroom, school, or district findings.Sharan, S. "Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations." Review of Educational Research 50/2 (1980): 241-271.
Reviews research on five different cooperative learning methods to determine their relative effects on achievement, social-affective variables, and racial/ethnic relations.Shepard, L. A., and Smith, M. L. "Synthesis of Research on Grade Retention." Educational Leadership 47/8 (1990): 84-88.
Summarizes research on the effects of grade retention on student achievement, dropout rates, and socialemotional outcomes. Concludes that retention
negatively impacts all of these outcome areas and proposes alternatives to this widely used practice.Sizemore, B. A, "Pitfalls and Promises of Effective Schools Research." Journal of Negro Education 54/3 (1985): 269-288.
Discuses findings from a study by the author and her colleagues regarding effective, predominantly black schools, especially as these findings relate to the effective schooling research.Sizemore, B. A. "The Effective African-American Elementary School." In G. W. Noblit and W. T. Pink (eds.), Schooling in Social Context: Quantitative Studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987, pp. 175-202.
Presents findings from an in-depth study of poor, black, urban elementary schools at which students performed at higher levels than would be expected, given their demographics. Attributes their success largely to the routine use of several effective teaching practices.Sizemore, B. A.; Brossard, C. A.; and Harrigan, B. An Abashing Anomoly: The High Achieving Predominantly Black Elementary School--Executive Summary. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University, Department of Black Community Education, 1983. (ED 236 275)
Discusses a study to determine which organizational factors were responsible for the unusually high achievement of the students in three urban elementary schools. Sharing of authority, incorporation of black culture and history into the curriculum, and strong school-parent connections were among the factors cited.Slavin, R. E. "Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis." Review of Educational Research 60 (1990): 471-499.
Reviews well-designed research studies on the effects of ability grouping on the standardized test performance of secondary students. Ability grouping strategies showed no advantages over heterogeneous grouping for promoting student achievement.Slavin, R. E. "Effects of Biracial Learning Teams on Cross-Racial Friendships." Journal of Educational Psychology 71/3 (1979): 381-387.
Examines the effects of racially mixed learning teams on cross-racial friendships of black and white students in junior high schools. Compared to controls, team participants identified a greater number and proportion of cross-racial friendships; effects were the same for blacks and whites.Slavin, R. E.; Karweit, N. L.; and Madden, N. A. Effective Programs for Students at Risk. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1989.
Summarizes approaches shown by research to be effective in educating at-risk students, particularly those in compensatory education programs. Findings regarding in-class and pullout programs and programs for different age/grade levels are presented.So, A. Y. "Bilingual Education and Hispanic Reading Achievement." Contemporary Education 59/1 (1987): 27- 29.
Analyzes data from the High School and Beyond Study on limited English speaking and non-English speaking Hispanic students in different educational settings. Students receiving bilingual instruction demonstrated significantly better reading achievement than those receiving Spanish-only or English-only instruction.Valverde, L. A. "Principals Creating Better Schools in Minority Communities." Education and Urban Society 20/4 (1988): 319-326.
Briefly reviews the status of minority students in U.S. public schools, summarizes research on effective principals, and offers suggestions for principals to increase their effectiveness in multicultural environments.Venezky, R. L., and Winfield, L. F. "Schools That Succeed Beyond Expectations in Reading." Studies in Education. Newark, DE: University of Delaware, 1979. (ED 177 484)
Presents results of an indepth study of two, urban, low-SES, mostly black and Hispanic elementary schools to determine factors that accounted for their unusually successful reading achievement outcomes. Achievementoriented principals and instructional efficiency were the main factors cited.Walberg, H. J.; Bole, R. E.; and Waxman, H. C. "School-Based Family Socialization and Reading Achievement in the Inner City." Psychology in the Schools 17/4 (1980): 509-514.
Examines the effects of a program of parent involvement in instruction in an all-black Chicago elementary school. Intensively involved students gained .5 to .6 grade equivalents more than less intensively involved students in reading comprehension.Waxman, H. C. "Urban Black and Hispanic Elementary School Students; Perceptions of Classroom Instruction." Journal of Research and Development in Education 22/2 (1989): 57-61.
Examines students' perceptions of different aspects of their teachers' classroom instruction in relation to their achievement. Positive perceptions of instructional time and structuring comments were positively related to black students' achievement. Hispanic students' achievement was greatest in classes where they perceived instructional pacing and level of difficulty as appropriate.Weber, G. Inner-City Children Can Be Taught to Read: Four Successful Schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education, 1971.
Examines factors related to success in reading performance in four big city elementary schools. Characteristics associated with positive reading outcomes include strong leadership, high expectations, good climate, strong emphasis on reading and use of reading specialists, and careful monitoring of student progress.
GENERAL REFERENCES
Alderman, M. K. "Motivation for At-Risk Students." Educational Leadership 48/1 (1990): 27-30.
Discusses research on learning motivation and offers recommendations for teachers to use to increase motivation among their students.Bain, J. H., and Herman, J. L. Improving Opportunities for Underachieving Minority Students: A Planning Guide for Community Action. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1989.
Offers guidelines for school personnel to use to engage community support and work with community groups to improve schooling outcomes for low-achieving minority students.Bates, P. "Desegregation: Can We Get There From Here." Educational Leadership 72/1 (1990): 8-17.
Discusses recently published reports on desegregation and equity in American schools, particularly Resegregation of Public Schools: The Third Generation, which addresses desegregation issues across schools, within schools, and with regard to equality of learning opportunities.Blank, R. K. "The Role of Principal as Leader: Analysis of Variation in Leadership of Urban High Schools." Journal of Educational Research 81/2 (1987): 69-80.
Analyzes urban principals' leadership behavior in six areas shown to be related to school effectiveness. Most urban principals were relatively weak in areas relating to instruction/innovation, goal consensus, staff development, resource seeking, and involving staff in planning.Caldwell, J. "The Need for ‘Anti-Racism' Education." Education Week, September 20, 1989, p. 2.
Presents the rationale for anti-racism education in middle and high schools and provides examples of the benefits of anti-racism programs in particular schools.Clayton, C. "We Can Educate All Our Children." The Nation 249/4 (1989): 132-135.
Asserts that the plight of urban minority schools emanates largely from a failure to value the students in these school adequately. Provides highlights from the effective schooling research and from the the school reform literature.Corcoran, T. B.; Walker, L. J.; and White, J. L. Working in Urban Schools. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership, 1988.
Presents the results of a study called the Teacher Working Conditions Project, which collected descriptive information on teaching conditions in 31 schools in five urban school districts--Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; Indianapolis, Indiana, New Orleans, Louisians; and Rochester, New York.Farrell, E. J. "On the Growing Shortage of Black and Hispanic Teachers." English Journal 79/1 (1990): 39- 46.
Discusses the phenomenon of the decreasing percentage of minority teachers at a time when the minority portion of the student population is increasing. Discusses reasons for and problems associated with the shortage and offers suggestions for attracting, retaining and effectively preparing minority teachers.Fernandez, R. R., and Shu, G. "School Dropouts: New Approaches to An Enduring Problem." Education and Urban Society 20/4 (1988): 363-386.
Discusses research and statistics on school dropouts, and particularly Hispanic dropouts, and outlines issues associated with efforts to reduce the Hispanic dropout rate.Frazier, M. M. "Poor and Minority Students Can Be Gifted, Too!" Educational Leadership 46/6 (1989): 16- 18.
Discusses the inadequacies of traditional instruments for ascertaining intelligence and giftedness and proposes alternative methods which are more suitable for identifying giftedness among minority children.Gabelko, N. H. "Prejudice Reduction in Secondary Schools." Social Education 52/4 (1988): 276-279.
Outlines the beneficial effects of teaching which enables students to become "cognitively sophisticated"- -to grow in critical thinking skills, learn to question, and develop personal meaning through experience and investigation. Offers evidence that this approach is more effective in reducing prejudice than exhortation.Garcia, A. "Just When You Thought It Was Safe: Racism in the Schools." Educational Horizons 67/4 (1989): 156-162.
Discusses racism in American society, including definitions of racism, the insidious presense of racism in our social institutions, the way racist attitudes develop, the failure of schools to address racism in a meaningful way, and recommendations for schools to work toward eradicating racism.Geary, P. A. "Defying the Odds?": Academic Success Among At-Risk Minority Teenagers in an Urban High School. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, April 1988. (ED 296 055)
Identifies attitudes and behaviors of black, innercity secondary students that enabled them to succeed despite the many inhibiting social and economic factors in their lives.Geary, P. A. The Student Experience: At-Risk, College Prep, Minority Teenagers in an Urban High School. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, March 1989. (ED 310 215)
Describes the behavior and attitudes of academically and socially successful students in an all-black innercity high school. This is essentially the same report as Geary 1988, above.Grant, C. A. "Desegregation, Racial Attitudes, and Intergroup Contact: A Discussion of Change." Phi Delta Kappan 72/1 (1990): 25-32.
Discusses the ways that racism and ethnic prejudice affect students of different racial and ethnic backgrounds and makes recommendations for change in the approach schools take to desegregation and multicultural education.Hart, T. E., and Lumsden, L. Confronting Racism in the Schools. Eugene, OR: Oregon School Study Council, May 1989. (ED 306 705).
Discusses ethnic changes in U.S. schools in recent years, delineates ways to recognize racial and ethnic bias, cites the value of multicultural education, lists programs to promote cultural acceptance, and offers guidelines for developing a plan to reduce biases and promote multicultural understanding.Knapp, M. S., and Shields, P. M. "Reconceiving Academic Instruction for the Children of Poverty." Phi Delta Kappan 71/10 (1990): 753-758.
Presents an analysis very similar to that reported in Knapp, Turnbull, and Shields (1990), below.Knapp, M. S.; Turnbull, B. J.; and Shields, P. M. "New Directions for Education the Children of Poverty." Educational Leadership 48/1 (1990): 4-8.
Identifies several areas of "conventional wisdom" about how to teach disadvantaged learners--curriculum organization, instructional approach, classroom management, and instructional grouping--critiques these, and offers research-based alternatives which may better serve these children's needs.Magallan, R.; De Necochea, G.; and Hirsch, D. "Programs That Work." Change 20/3 (1988): 63-65.
Provides brief descriptions of and provides contact information for programs which have been shown to be effective in promoting the achievement of Hispanic children and youth.McWilliams, E. S., ed. Resegregation of Public Schools: The Third Generation. Washington, DC: Network of Regional Desegregation Assistance Centers, June 1989.
Reviews the history of school desegregation and its effects on limited-English speaking students, students of minority races, and girl students.Mock, K. R. Multicultural and Anti-Racist Education: The Developmental Rationale and Practical Implications, 1988. (ED 304 243)
Discusses child development and theories of learning in relation to racial and cultural attitudes, and offers recommendations for teachers to use to help their students become comfortable in different cultural contexts.National Center for Education Statistics. Dropout Rates in the United States. Washington, DC: Education Department, OERI Information Services, 1989.
Presents statistical information on current student dropout rates in America's schools, for example: 33 percent of Hispanic students, 13.8 percent of black students, and 12.4 percent of black students drop out.Pine, G. J., and Hilliard, A. G. "Rx for Racism: Imperatives for America's Schools." Phi Delta Kappan 71/8 (1990): 593-600.
Discusses the nature of racism in American society and the ways that racial and cultural biases are perpetuated in the public education system. Argues that the schools can have a powerful, positive effect on racism in society and offers recommendations to educators and policymakers.Reed, S., and Sautter, R. C. "Children of Poverty: The Status of 12 Million Young Americans." Phi Delta Kappan 71/10 (1990): 1-12.
Analyzes the econonomic circumstances of children in the United States and concludes that, "more than 25 years after America first declared war on poverty, the nation's children are worse off than ever." Proposes increased government funding and school-community collaboration to address the problems associated with widespread poverty.Serwatka, T. S.; Deering, S.; and Stoddard, A. "Correlates of the Underrepresentation of Black Students in Classes for Gifted Students." Journal of Negro Education 58/4 (1989): 520-530.
Uses statewide data to investigate the factors associated with the underrepresentation of black students in gifted programs in Florida. Few significant correlates were identified, but greater numbers of black teachers in a school were associated with both increased gifted placements and decreased EMR placements.Sleeter, C. E. "Staff Development for Desegregated Schooling." Phi Delta Kappan 72/1 (1990): 33-40.
Discusses issues in staff development to improve desegregation across schools, within schools, and toward equalizing educational outcomes. Offers critiques of typical desegregation-related staff development activities and presents information on promising practices.Soder, R., and Andrews, R. "Equity and Excellence: The Moral Imperatives of Compulsory Schooling." Curriculum in Context (1985): 6-9.
Presents findings from research on the differences in academic achievement among white, Asian and black students and discusses society's obligations to insure equality of treatment and outcomes for all students.Strickland, G., and Holzman, L. "Developing Poor and Minority Children as Leaders with the Barbara Taylor School Educational Model." Journal of Negro Education 58/3 (1989): 383-398.
Discusses the effects of a model intended to address racism, classism, sexism, homophobia, anti-Semitism and other social forces which inhibit children's learning and development--particularly poor and minority children.Taeuber, K. "Desegregation of Public School Districts: Persistence and Change." Phi Delta Kappan 72/1 (1990): 18-24.
Reviews the history of desegregation legislation and activity in the United States since the historic Brown vs. the Board of Education decision. Notes that the degree of desegregation accomplished in the early years after the Brown legislation has been maintained.Tillman, J. "Preparing Effective Classroom Teachers for Urban Schools: A Quintessential Role for NCATE." Action in Teacher Education 11/2 (1989): 39-40.
Outlines problems associated with preparing teachers for working in urban schools and identifies steps that NCATE can take to increase understanding of teacher preparation needs and address these needs.Tyler, R. W. "Educating Children from Minority Families." Educational Horizons 67/4 (1989): 114-118.
Offers research- and experience-based suggestions for reaching and offering relevant and effective learning experiences to minority--and often poor--children. Emphasizes community-based improvement strategies.Varney, S. S., and Cushner, K. "Understanding Cultural Diversity Can Improve Intercultural Interactions." NASSP Bulletin 74/528 (1990): 89-94.
Discusses issues and problems associated with intercultural interactions and proposes staff development programs designed to help school staff anticipate and deal with common intercultural misunderstandings.Walsh, D. "Critical Thinking to Reduce Prejudice." Social Education 52/4 (1988): 280-282.
Reviews the intellectual and attitudinal characteristics essential for critical thinking and discusses the application of these to reducing prejudice among young people in school settings.Williams, J. "Reducing the Disproportionately High Frequency of Disciplinary Actions Against Minority Students: An Assessment-Based Policy Approach." Equity and Excellence 24/2 (1989): 31-37.
Describes methods whereby collection and review of assessment data, together with review and rewriting of discipline policies, can increase equity in the application of disciplinary sanctions between white and minority students.Young, L. J., and Melnick, S. L. "Forsaken Lives, Abandoned Dreams: What Will Compel Us to Act." (Review of The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy by William J. Wilson). Harvard Educational Review 58/3 (1988): 380- 394.
Reviews and critiques Wilson's book about the plight of inner-city populations and the reasons for the worsening of social and economic conditions in the inner city in recent years.
This publication is based on work sponsored wholly, or in part, by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, under Contract Number 400-86-0006. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views of OERI, the Department, or any other agency of the U.S. Government.
March 1991
This document's URL is:
Home | Up & Coming | Programs & Projects: School Improvement | People | Products & Publications | Topics
© 2001 Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory
Date of Last Update: 8/31/01
Email Webmaster
Tel. 503.275.9500![]()