NW Laboratory Home


Block Scheduling, the combining of two or more periods, is among the hot topics in middle schools today. The National Middle School Association (NMSA) says that about 20 percent of middle-level schools use some form of flexible scheduling, be it block scheduling, alternate day classes, rotating schedules, or dropped schedule.

In a research summary on flexible scheduling, the NMSA notes: "With large blocks of time to facilitate involvement, students benefit from less fragmentation and more engagement in project- based learning and interdisciplinary activities, promoting skill application, interpersonal relations, and decisionmaking skills related to concrete, relevant problems. Results indicate increased student engagement and achievement and positive social ramifications.

We listened to the online discussions of educators on the MIDDLE-L Listserv. The discussion was triggered when a Yakima, Washington, teacher asked for advice about how teachers work best in block scheduling situations. An edited version of the discussion follows.

Our middle school will go from a traditional seven-period day with one personal planning period daily for each teacher to a block schedule, which will include one personal planning period and one team planning period per day. The block of academic time will be for five periods, during which students will receive instruction from their interdisciplinary team of teachers. Students will spend the other two periods of time in PE, music, and exploratory classes.

As a staff, we are very excited and also nervous about how this will go. We have been teamed for about five years and have continued to move to pure teams and common planning time, as well as incorporating interdisciplinary instruction. We are working toward more integrated instruction and hope the team planning will give us the much needed time to reach our goals.

My questions: Many teachers are confused about how a team of three, four, or five teachers will use this block of time. Does it mean some teachers will "give up" time? How have others looked at this time and made it work for everyone on the team?

Also, how have teams dealt with special ed and ESL students who are currently either pulled out for one or more periods per day or "dropped in" for one or more periods, depending on the IEP of each student?

Harriet Young
Wilson Middle School
Yakima, Washington


One quick thought for you and your team: To take full advantage of the academic block will require a paradigm shift from the assumption inherent in your phrase "will receive instruction from" to a view of the team as a community of learners, all of whom are active in determining what is to be studied and how those topics or questions might best be pursued. Frontal, passive "instruction" gives way to engaging activities with students and teachers planning the foundation. Having the academic block is a real opportunity, but exploiting it to enhance learning requires a shift from the traditional ways of instruction. Good luck.
John H. Lounsbury
NMSA Publications


The block of time ought to be for the team to decide how to use. In the case of the four-person team I worked on, we each usually divided our block into fourths and spread the students into four groups. That is, we created typical class periods. However, sometimes we'd see half the students one day and the other half the next day for double periods if we needed extra time. If an assembly or other activity interrupted the day, we'd divide whatever time was left to us into equal parts so we'd see everyone during the day. As for special ed students, we were involved in "Class-Within-A-Class," where the special ed teacher came into our classrooms rather than having the students leave.

Howard Miller
Associate Professor
of Middle School Education
Lincoln University
Jefferson, Missouri


We have a similar schedule to what you plan. It is wonderful. Sometimes we have a traditional day where students move from one class to the next. On other days, we may block our time, and students would have two subjects. Another day might bring integrated activities. Our team believes it is important to make use of the time as needed to meet our goals. As you can see we must be flexible, yet realistic. Good luck!

Jo E. Read
Leawood Middle School
Kansas City, Missouri


We adopted that system (somewhat modified) this year and have had great results. Our teachers have one planning period a day; as a team, they meet four times a week. If anything, teachers have found that there is not enough time; several times, they have continued to meet from the team planning period through their personal planning time. They do all sorts of things: meet with students (problems and commendations), hold parent conferences, plan activities and interdisciplinary units, plan field trips, discuss student progress, do scheduling of students. I have seen more interdisciplinary work this year than ever in the past. An added benefit is that discipline problems have been reduced—teachers catch things much earlier now and, as a team, address any concerns they have about students.

We added a half-team of 50 students at each grade level to reduce the number of kids per team and then reduced the number of classes a teacher teaches from five to four and used that extra period to get the team planning time.

The major drawback we have found is that the core area teams are working great and use the planning time very effectively; we have not, though, found a way to involve the unified teachers as much as we would like and they have a feeling of real isolation. That is still a work in progress.

We have a skill center where kids get academic support from the core area teachers, the foreign languages classes are taught and the special education (SPED) youngsters can get their support; we try to pull as few kids out of the classes as possible. This seems to be working. We have assigned one sped teacher to two teams and at one of the weekly team times, the sped teacher meets with the core teachers. Hope this helps.

Dr. Jurgen Combs
Mt. Anthony Middle School,
Bennington, VT 05201

To subscribe to MIDDLE-L, send a one-line e-mail message that reads: subscribe MIDDLE-L followed by your first name and last name (not your login name). Send the message to: listserv@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu.


Previous Article | Index

This document's URL is:

Home | Up & Coming | Programs & Projects: Northwest Education | People | Products & Publications | Topics

© 2001 Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

Date of Last Update: 9/28/01
Email Webmaster
Tel. 503.275.9500

NW Lab Home