NW Laboratory Home

you've now skipped links.

Northwest Education Magazine - link to main index

professional give and take
"Leaders who see themselves as stewards will be able to create school communities that are both collegial and responsive to the needs of community members."
— Larry Lashway, JoAnn Mazzarella, and Thomas Grundy
School Leadership: Handbook for Excellence

Many scholars are in fact refining the idea of instructional leadership to reflect this finding. Instructional leadership, they argue, ought to be done in a collaborative — or facilitative — fashion. Organizations work best, writes Larry Lashway in School Leadership, "when employees at all levels are actively engaged in solving problems. The leader's role is to get that involvement." Facilitative leadership, he says, "is based on mutuality and synergy, with power flowing in multiple directions." The old model — the leader issuing edicts from the point of a pyramid — is looking as quaint and out-of-date as poodle skirts and pegged pants. The enlightened leader of today works in the background using a process Lashway calls "professional give-and-take" to move the school forward.

David Conley and Paul Goldman identified the key strategies used by this new breed of leaders in Facilitative Leadership: How Principals Lead Without Dominating, published by the Oregon School Study Council in 1994. Facilitative leaders:

  • Overcome resource constraints
  • Build teams
  • Provide feedback, coordination, and conflict management
  • Create communication networks
  • Practice collaborative politics
  • Model the school's vision
"A leader's competence is most clearly manifest in the ability to empower and inspire others."
— Stuart Smith and Philip Piele
School Leadership: Handbook for Excellence

This last strategy, "model the school's vision," can happen only if and when that vision is clearly drawn. "If there is one broad area of agreement among researchers, consultants, those who teach prospective principals, and the principals themselves," Bess Keller writes, "it is that schools must have a clear idea of what they are about."

The vision is not plucked from thin air. Nor is it imposed from above. Rather, it must take root in the school's history — the shared norms, beliefs, traditions, and myths of the school community. This deeply embedded context in which the school operates — what researchers call school culture — is the seedbed from which a guiding vision must grow. Only by knowing and understanding her school's quirks, cliques, penchants, piques, feuds, dreams, and habits (good and bad) can a principal hope to travel toward a workable vision.

"School culture is the product of a succession of diverse and ever-changing social relationships among those who work and live in the school," write Stephen Stolp and Stuart Smith in School Culture and Climate: The Role of the Leader, published by the Oregon School Study Council in 1994. "Does the school's faculty have a history of conflict or collaboration? Why do teachers, who once had a habit of staying at the school until 5 p.m., now, with a new principal in the building, quickly head for the parking lot after the last bell has rung? To ask these types of questions — in pursuit of the roots of conflict or a lost work ethic — is to engage in cultural analysis."

To understand a school's culture, the principal needs to first spend time observing and listening — in other words, sopping up and mulling over the countless details that together form this one-of-a-kind place. "Then and only then," Stolp and Smith counsel, "a principal can begin to approach change by empowering staff and negotiating a shared culture of meaning." The researchers offer the following practical suggestions for changing school culture:

  • Establish a shared vision. "Make vision-building a collective exercise," recommends Michael Fullan, Dean of Education at the University of Toronto. By giving a variety of people the opportunity to help create the vision, students and staff share some responsibility for culture building, Fullan notes.
  • Reconceptualize leadership roles. The traditional view of a leader as an authoritarian decisionmaker is a "dead concept," say Stolp and Smith. "True," they note, "leaders must at times make unpopular and difficult decisions, but they should do so in a collaborative process." They cite Peter Senge, Director of the Center for Organizational Learning at MIT and author of The Fifth Discipline, who offers a three-fold model for rethinking leadership roles. In this model, the leader is designer, teacher, and steward. "The most important prerequisite is a willingness to relinquish some authority and control of the administrative and creative process," Stolp and Smith stress.
  • Think systemically. "In simplistic terms, systems theory derives from focusing less on particulars and more on the whole," the researchers write. "In a school culture, systems thinking might include concentrating less on day-to-day events and more on underlying trends and forces of change." When administrators think of the system as an interlocking unit, they shift their focus away from this nut or that bolt to the fluidity or friction of the machine as a whole — from the "particular components of organizational management to the underlying cultural relationships," in the researchers' words. "Changing school culture may require modifications of particular components of the school," they say, "but the outcome will not be successful without a more holistic focus."
  • Make full use of the principal's authority and leadership. To the question, Can the principal make a difference? researchers say, Yes, definitely. Fred Hechinger, who wrote the foreword to Effective Principal, Effective School Reform by James Lipham (1981) said: "I have never seen a good school with a poor principal or a poor school with a good principal. I have seen unsuccessful schools turned into successful ones and, regrettably, outstanding schools slide rapidly into decline. In each case, the rise or fall could readily be traced to the quality of the principal." Martin Maehr and Stephanie Parker in a 1993 article in Phi Delta Kappan write: "Leaders are not simply the captives of culture. They can and do affect it."

1 2 3 4 5 6

Back next

NW Education logo
Volume 5 Number 3

The New Principal

In This Issue

Sharing the Lead

Special Report:
So Far, and Yet So Near
Compassionate Leadership
Driven by Data
The Good Humor Man
The Principal Kids Love to Hug

The Best Job in the World

Preparing to Lead

Principal's Notebook

About This Issue

Previous Issues

Text Only

Feedback

Subscribe


This document's URL is:

Home | Up & Coming | Programs & Projects: Northwest Education | People | Products & Publications | Topics

© 2001 Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

Date of Last Update: 9/28/01
Email Webmaster
Tel. 503.275.9500

NW Lab Home