NW Laboratory Home

NORTHWEST
EDUCATION

On the Road to Accountability
Summer 2005 / Volume 10, Number 4.
A publication of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

To print this page, select "Print" from the File menu of your browser

back Back to Graphic Version

Resource Annex

Articles

"Aiming for AYP," by Anand Vaishnav (Harvard Education Letter, January/February 2005: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 5-6).
A short article about the "educational tradeoffs" that the Brockton, Massachusetts school system has made in its attempt to meet adequate yearly progress.
Devil is in the Details: Rural-Sensitive Best Practices for Accountability under No Child Left Behind [Policy brief], by Lorna Jimerson (Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust, 2004).
www.ruraledu.org/docs/devildetails.pdf
Many aspects of AYP are especially challenging for rural schools and districts. This policy brief discusses those issues and offers several ideas for effectively addressing them.
"A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Education Reforms on School Capacity: Insights from Studies of High-Stakes Accountability Initiatives," by Betty Malen & Jennifer King Rice (Educational Policy, November 2004: Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 631-660).
This technical research study examines how NCLB and other educational reform policies, affect a school's capacity to change.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress [Topical summary], by Wendell Anderson (Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 2004).
www.nwrel.org/planning/reports/ayp/AYP.pdf
A first step for those trying to understand current accountability systems, this article is especially good for parents.
Making the Grade in AYP: What Your School Can Learn from This Year's Results, by Michael A. Resnick (Alexandria, VA: National School Board Association, 2004).
www.nsba.org/site/docs/34700/34655.pdf
An AYP primer for school board members, this article includes a discussion of the many variations in state policies.

Online documents

"Alternative Approaches to Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress," by Robert L. Linn, Eva L. Baker & Joan L. Herman (CRESST Line: Newsletter of the Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Winter 2003: pp. 1, 4-6).
http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/products/newsletters/CLwinter2003_draft.pdf
This online newsletter summarizes a 2002 conference that looked at many of the controversial aspects of AYP, and offered some alternatives.
Holding High Hopes: How High Schools Respond to State Accountability Policies [Policy brief], by Margaret E. Goertz and Diane Massell (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2005).
www.cpre.org/Publications/rb42.pdf
An in-depth look at how AYP and other accountability policies specifically affect high schools.
Requirements for Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress [Policy brief], by Robert L. Linn (Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, 2003).
http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/products/newsletters/policybrief6.pdf
This policy brief summarizes the basics of AYP and the challenges they present for traditionally low-performing schools.

Useful Web sites:

Education Commission of the States
ECS Report to the Nation. Indicator #2: Adequate Yearly Progress
www.ecs.org/html/Special/NCLB/ReportToTheNation/docs/Indicator_2.pdf
National School Board Association
Adequate Yearly Progress
www.nsba.org/site/page.asp?TRACKID=&VID=1&CID=1172&DID=31602

Original URL: http://www.nwrel.org/nwedu/10-04/annex/

This online version is based upon the print version of the magazine. The information contained in it was current at the time of printing.

Contact us: nwedufeedback@nwrel.org

Copyright © 2005, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.