The attached pages come from a short handbook designed to give primary grade teachers some ideas on how to begin using portfolios in math for very young students. The author contends that the primary use for portfolios is to assist students to take control of their own learning. Students assemble their portfolios to tell a story about who they are mathematically. Students should be in control of their portfolios, and self-assessment should be emphasized. (The author, however, also points out that there might be other audiences and purposes for the portfolios that might have to be addressed.) The author provides ideas for tasks that students could do to generate material for the portfolio, provides some very practical suggestions for getting started, gives ideas for activities to encourage student self-reflection, discusses student-led conferences, and includes an entire portfolio for a second grade student.
There are many kinds of things suitable for a student's portfolio. Usually, students select items that are part of their classroom curriculum rather than things done specifically for the portfolio. Here are some ideas. As teachers, your role is to offer students the opportunity to produce things suitable for the portfolio. But it is the student who makes the final selections as a part of telling their story of their learning.
Manipulatives
Technology
Group Work
Real-World Examples
Interdisciplinary Efforts
Journals, Class Publications
Portfolio MenuBuilding a portfolio involves a wide variety of classroom activities. The more variety, the better. It is important to expose students to many kinds of activities so that they have a wide choice of things to put into their portfolios.
Portfolios offer several opportunities to view standards in a new way. A recent, and exciting development in portfolio assessment is student-negotiated standards. In student-negotiated standards, students take a leading role in setting personal standards that they use to guide their own progress. Here are some ways that you can encourage students to set standards.
This is a relatively new area and there are few guidelines in education. Negotiated standards have been successful in industry, especially in the work of W. Edwards Deming. For an example of student-negotiated standards in a writing portfolio, see Paulson, Paulson & Frazier (in press).
An Outstanding Portfolio
An outstanding portfolio is a coherent story of the student as a reflective learner where all the parts of the portfolio bear a clear relationship to each other and to a central purpose. There is an awareness of the perspectives of other stakeholders, and the student's self-assessment has been enhanced by this knowledge. A reviewer can look at the portfolio and easily understand how the judgments about the learner came to be made and the degree to which different stakeholders would agree. When reviewing the portfolio, outsiders get the feeling they really know the person whose achievement is depicted there, and have a fair understanding of how the learning came about.
An On-Track Portfolio
An on-track portfolio is in the process of becoming a story of the student as an independent learner. There are relationships between one part of the portfolio and another. There is evidence of student ownership. The learner has a personal investment in selecting and explaining the content. It is possible to distinguish other stakeholders' goals from the student's or to recognize instances when they overlap. The portfolio may be created for others to assess, but there is also evidence of self-assessment. The student's voice is always audible.
An Emerging Portfolio
In an emerging portfolio there is a sense of intentionally controlling some of the student's choices. Students may not be able to verbalize the reasons, even as they reflect on their choices, but the reviewer may be able to recognize a relationship between some exhibits or infer the reasons. Or, there may be evidence that the student had some insight into the teacher's purposes. While evidence of self-reflection adds information to the presentation, at this point in the development of the portfolio there is insufficient information or organization to characterize the portfolio as either a story of learning or a portrait of the learner.
An Off-track portfolio
An off-track portfolio is simply a container of student work or assessments, without an attempt on the part of the learner to provide organization. There is no attempt by the learner to make a coherent statement about what learning has taken place. The child's understanding of the task is minimal, the portfolio is about "collecting what the teacher asks for." For the student, the portfolio was built by following instructions. Self-reflective statements, if present, add little to clarify organization or explain learning. Based on "A Guide for Judging Portfolios" by F. L. and Pearl R. Paulson. (Available from the author.)